We carry out feasibility, existing-conditions, verification, change and readiness studies on your plant as it is built.
We offer seven services, each named after the stage of your project it serves. Each is a fixed deliverable, and we agree its scope with you before we start.
01 Front end
You have a new line or a piece of equipment in mind and need to know whether it fits the plant before design starts.
Your site's engineer of record signs the verdict.
02 Before tender
Your brownfield project is going to design and tender, and the drawings no longer match the site.
We issue it to your designers and bidders before the contract is awarded.
03 Handover
A project is finishing and you are about to accept what was installed.
Your project engineer signs the handover.
04 Change control
You need to take a change through change control on a plant that keeps running.
Your project engineer approves the change.
05 Shutdown
Your shutdown window is fixed and the scope has to be ready on the day.
Your shutdown planner stays in charge of the window.
06 Acquisition
You are buying, investing in or qualifying a site or a supplier.
Your deal team keeps the decision.
07 Physical AI
You are bringing robot fleets or other autonomous systems into a running plant and need to know the site is ready before deployment.
Your integrator keeps the robots and their safety case.
We check the receiving site's fit, utilities, room class, equipment and evidence gaps, and give a readiness date with its confidence.
We list the unknowns that decide the project, what each would change and what it costs to close.
We compare layouts, shutdown sequences and phasing on one baseline and write the predictions down before the work starts.
We re-observe a modelled site on a schedule, so the next study starts from a current record.
We map what is connected, what is shared and the order in which equipment can come out.
With your permission, the supplier lays out its equipment on the site model and saves a site visit.
We connect your planning data to the lines, utilities, downtime and physical constraints behind it, and show what each site has demonstrated it can make. The studies run on the same site model as our engineering work.
The validated operating state the other studies depend on, built from your own exports, with a weekly or monthly record of what changed.
We separate nameplate, planned and demonstrated capacity and name the physical constraint that binds, whether that is changeover footprint, utility headroom, space, access or a shutdown.
What a stoppage, an outage or a shutdown does to throughput, and the physical options for reducing the loss. We write the predictions down before the event.
We check growth scenarios against space, utilities, access and shutdown needs. It works like a feasibility study, aimed at a capacity question.
Demonstrated capacity and receiving-site constraints for your network model. It needs two or more modelled sites.
Which sites can take on the capability, capacity and transfer you need, with evidence for their condition and the transfer cost. Your network or deal team keeps the decision.
There are two ways to start. Either way, the first job becomes the first part of your site's model.
A site with a capex project in its front end
We attach SyntaGraph™ to the project, capture and reconcile the site, and issue a verified existing-conditions baseline with its discrepancy register. Your designers and bidders work from your own evidence, and we check the handover against the same baseline later.
Build the baselineOne difficult engineering question
You bring one question, such as whether this equipment fits here or whether the change fits inside the shutdown. Our engineer walks the bay and checks footprint, clearance, access and utilities against what is installed, and the verdict records every place where the drawing disagrees with the bay. The proposal fixes the scope, price and turnaround.
Start a studyOur AI extracts the evidence, reconciles the records, prepares the analysis cases and drafts the work. Where the work needs professional judgment or statutory accountability, a qualified engineer is responsible for the decision and the approval.
A new line can change the airflow, thermal load and utility headroom in the rooms around it. SyntaGraph™ builds the analysis case from the same evidence as the study, and we route it to a suitable calculation or simulation method. After the change, we measure what happened.
Process physics, what the product does inside the machine, stays with your process engineer.
01
A calculator with a declared method and validity range, or a learned model inside the domain it was validated on, with the uncertainty shown. A learned-model result is labelled predicted until a solver has verified it.
02
A named deterministic solver on a named case, with residual checks.
03
Read on the installed plant after the change and compared with the prediction.
04
Reviewed and approved by the engineer of record where professional accountability requires it.
We add capabilities one domain at a time, and each proposal states which methods are available for that study.
Each study leaves a record of the site. The next study starts from it and re-verifies what has changed.
The answer with its evidence and open conditions. Each finding is marked Verified where the evidence supports it, or Not Demonstrated where the evidence runs out, with the observation that would close the gap.
Every place where the drawings, records, scans and the site walk disagree, with the evidence for each.
The verified plant on SyntaGraph™, kept between projects. It exports in an open format.
After the change we come back and record what happened against what was predicted. The visit is priced into every proposal.
We price each study by its deliverable, and the proposal fixes the scope, price and turnaround. A repeat study on a site we have already modelled starts from what is already verified, and we scope it from there.
Before award, we give you your own evidence of the site, and the EPCM designs and bids against that baseline. After handover, our as-built verification checks the project's records against the installed plant before you accept it.
Your data trains nothing without a permission you negotiated. We write the sources, rights and any reuse into the study. You keep your systems of record, and the site model exports in an open format.
The verdict says so. It names the gap, why it matters and what would close it. That is still a result of the study, and we price it as one.
Send us the site, the project stage and the decision in front of you. We will come back with the deliverable, its scope and the evidence it needs.